AdamV158. one of the still “beta” features of btrfs. 4 was performing the best for RAID0 and RAID10 modes while with RAID1, XFS was performing the best. Overall, except for application launch time, benchmark results show that ZFS is the slowest file system in terms of read and write speed due to its COW operating type, while EXT4 is usually the fastest system. When running PostMark, ZFS came out far ahead of the UFS file-systems being more than ten times faster than. 가능. But none of these will be relevant to a bog standard use case like "browsing the internet and sometimes. 1 only) xfs (RHEL 7. What we mean is that we need something like resize2fs (ext4) for enlarge or shrunk on the fly, and not required to use another filesystem to store the dump for the resizing. Each of the tested file-systems were carried out with the default mount options in an out-of-the-box manner. You can easily backup each distro without filling your disk using snapshots. . And generally, files that arent compressible, wont be forcefully compressed. Seeking around those files which a DB will do may yield different. Sure, BtrFS has its benefits and novel features, but "has never once failed me in 10+ years" is an incredibly strong reliability trend that I'd be hesitant to trade for those, especially in a piece of my infrastructure where a single failure could potentially cause massive loss of data and subsequent time spent recovering from backups/etc. Regarding filesystems. Example 2: ZFS has licensing issues to Distribution-wide support is spotty. That XFS performs best on fast storage and better hardware allowing more parallelism was my conclusion too. My problem is that in some games when DXVK is running in Linux, stutters occur, although there are no such problems on Windows. Small_Light_9964 • 1 yr. 84 nvme drives split up into a small ext4 volume and the rest is btrfs. Ext4 file system is the successor to Ext3, and the mainstream file system under Linux. For the Proxmox host, if you install it and use LVM-thin as root pool option in the Proxmox installer, it will automatically make a root partition in EXT4. Reviews of EXT4, EXT3, XFS, BTRFS, and ZFS. And xfs. El ext4 y xf. 특히 시놀로지에서는 데이터 보호와 백업의 용이함을 장점으로 내세운 Btrfs를 권장합니다. On the HDD the Bcachefs performance was just behind EXT4 but doing much better than Btrfs though not nearly as fast as XFS in this. It is suitable for PC platforms and network. Using Btrfs, just expanding a zip file. 7 - EXT4 vs. That was many years ago, perhaps when btrfs was less ready. Yes Ext4 is much easier to setup but BTRFS has its advantages. The only benefit of btrfs that I could find was marginally easier setup and the software license. What takes up space is each consecutive data change, that is why snapshots are created instantaneously. Delay allocation. – cas. Ext4 file systems. Agree, actually I have a bunch of freebsd for ZFS. ) keep in mind that the performance are not the same depending on the chosen file system , also note that btrfs (video-1, video-2) may be a very good option because of its snapshot feature and data structure. NTFS Benchmarks Continuing on from yesterday's Linux 4. EXT4 has been the Linux default since 2006, following the previous EXT3. A daily snapshot of Ubuntu 19. 0 File-System Benchmarks: Btrfs vs. Its OS comes with only one by default (mostly it’s NTFS, FAT 32, or HFS). It's the only file system out of the box read/write/format supported by Windows, Mac, and Linux. For reducing the size of a filesystem, there are two purported wats forward, according to xfs developers. As a reminder, luks encrypted partition are not dependent on the used file system (ext3/ext4/etc. file-system comparison, here are some fresh benchmarks looking at the Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS file-system benchmarks on a speedy WD_BLACK SN850 NVMe solid-state drive. FYI: btrfs. So với Ext4, Btrfs hoạt động ổn đinh hơn, dễ dàng quản lý hơn và tích hợp nhiều ứng dụng hỗ trợ tốt cho doanh nghiệp Quy mô lớn. A Red Hat training course is available for RHEL 8. A maximum partition size of the btrfs file system is 16 exbibytes, as well as maximum file size is 16 exbibytes too. Ext4 and XFS are both great for "I need a filesystem, to store files, on this drive". We believe that btrfs has the correct feature set and roadmap to serve Ceph in the long-term, but XFS and ext4. Each of the five file-systems were tested on the same NVM Express SSD from the Linux 4. • 2 yr. BTRFS have some fancy features, and could help you manage your disk better in some automation-future-proof way. 7 - Btrfs vs. Dropping performance in case with 4 threads for ext4 is a signal that there still are contention issues. use ZFS only w/ ECC RAM. - Linux Kernel 5. The PostgreSQL database server ran well particularly on EXT4 and XFS while F2FS on the USB 3. I think in many ways btrfs is the better filesystem, but I seem to have noticed that it takes longer to copy data than on ext4. Ext4 比 Btrfs 更穩定嗎？ 儘管在撰寫本文時 Btrfs 缺乏穩定性和. This is an issue for those like me who have older laptops e. And you might just as well use EXT4. I've set up and used btrfs for years and later zfs for the past few years both professionally and on home servers. EXT4 had the best speed at 58MB/s while Btrfs came in slightly behind that at 52MB/s and then ZFS came in at 46MB/s. Its OS comes with only one by default (mostly it’s NTFS, FAT 32, or HFS). ZFS is great but heavy/complex, and lack of block pointer rewrite can be painful. Ext4 - очень стабильная файловая система, которая была выбрана по. It's an improved version of the older Ext3 file system. Thanks. Does that mean that if I'm using btrfs snapshots, it will not save parity data for any snapshots other than the current state of the drive, that it will only save parity data for one snapshot other than the current state of the drive, or that it will fail entirely?ZFS can also send and receive file system snapshots, a process which allows users to optimize their disk space. This is because BTRFS is optimized for handling small files, while EXT4 can struggle with multiple small files due to its delayed allocation. . 1. Btrfs 與 EXT4 常見問題解答. This is the first time that the new EXT4 and Btrfs and NILFS2 filesystems have been directly compared when it comes to their disk performance though the results may surprise. Each one might work for you based on YOUR needs! Supp. 500GB HDD formatted as NTFS for luks containers. Compared to ext4, XFS has unlimited inode allocation, advanced allocation hinting (if you need it) and, in recent version, reflink support (but they need to be explicitly enabled in. As others have said, btrfs is newer and offers a few advanced features for backups (snapshots) and data integrity. BTRFS also had somewhat higher latency than EXT4, meaning that it took longer for files to be accessed on the file system. you don't have to think about what you're doing because it's what. This is the number of data disks times the number of blocks per. Also, on ZFS, in Linux, it takes some tweaking to get it performing good, so I would suggest to go btrfs or XFS. Utilice. Tl;dr: The best filesystem for Unraid. Just EXT4, yes. 4TB HDD formatted as NTFS for backuping all other three hard disks. Ceph's recommendation for the choice of filesystem is between btrfs and XFS. EXT4 vs. Die Funktionen umfassen eine transparente Komprimierung, Prüfsummen und. The XFS one on the other hand take around 11-13 hours!With Bcachefs on its trek towards the mainline Linux kernel, this week I conducted some benchmarks using the very latest Bcachefs file-system code and compared its performance to the mainline Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS file-system competitors on both rotating and solid-state storage. XFS is more and more mature than Btrfs, but. Bảo vệ dữ liệu. 04 Disco Dingo was running on the Threadripper setup while using the Linux Git kernel from the mainline PPA. I've seen benchmarks (eg: this one) that put btrfs considerably slower than ext4. Ext4: cũng giống như Ext3, lưu giữ được những ưu điểm và tính tương thích ngược với phiên bản trước đó. El sistema de archivos es mayor de 2 TiB con inodos de 512 bytes. Small to Medium Enterprises: While ext3 suffices for businesses with modest data needs, scalability visionaries would do well considering ext4. First up was the SQLite embedded SQL database library test. If fs performance is the only or most important thing for you, then use xfs - it's the clear winner, by far. 0 SSD testing ran into a strange performance drop while Btrfs. Ext4 is the default system for most Distros. It does its job well. 7 - EXT4 vs. 0 File-System Benchmarks: Btrfs vs. a 3-drive RAID-Z (or RAID-5) would have the same capacity as a 4-drive pool of two mirrored pairs (or RAID-10). Uma das decisões que você tem que tomar quando vai instalar qualquer distro Linux é o Sistema de arquivos do Linux! São vários para escolher, EXT4, XFS e BTR. 0 X. You might also want to consider Btrfs for your array drives, but you should be aware of the potential risks. . The major difference between ext4 and XFS file systems is that the ext4 file system works better for fewer size files (single write/read thread) while the XFS works more efficiently. 240GB SSD formatted as EXT4 for main OS. Comparing the two is a semi-futile exercise. Better for gaming, my money is on ZFS if you have extra RAM to spare and restrict the cache size. 10 4. g. The NTFS support was powered by FUSE. Januar 2020. This page is powered by a knowledgeable community that helps you make an informed decision. 4 HDD RAID performance per his request with Btrfs, EXT4, and XFS while using consumer HDDs and an AMD Ryzen APU setup that could work out for a NAS type low-power system for anyone else that may be interested. It has features that can scale better than ext4 and is even preferred over ZFS by some users. Same as with ZFS. Checksum: if your file (or some metadata) gets corrupted, the checksum will detect and in some case. Currently I'm running on LVM with SSD caching and ext4 fs. 1 million iops for ext4, right in line with the spec of the drive times 2,. See moreWith not having the time to conduct the usual kernel version vs. Phoronix: Linux 5. SUSE Linux Enterprise Server ships with different file systems from which to choose, including Btrfs, Ext4, Ext3, Ext2 and XFS. but for the shared servers with many users you might consider xfs for the parallel IO and number of files. No such built-in compression support is in Ext4. Обзор Ext4 vs Btrfs vs XFS. btrfs sub cr /mnt/@ (the @ alone is the convention for "root directory" in btrfs) btrfs sub cr /mnt/@home. F2FS vs. Things like snapshots, copy-on-write, checksums and more. Btrfs, ZFS, and bcachefs are probably your best bets out of the 19 options considered. Out of curiosity I have tried BTRFS (still unstable so I can't really expect to be able to use it) and noticed that the read speed is about 150% of ext4 - while write speed is comparable. Die Benchmark-Testergebnisse zeigten, dass BTRFS etwas niedrigere Lese- und Schreibgeschwindigkeiten als EXT4 hatte. Not only does both file systems feature a more robust data assurances then XFS (the mature fsck for Ext4 and checksums and data. 15 Comparing KPTI/Retpoline. Data integrity protection. XFS. 1 million iops for ext4, right in line with the spec of the drive times 2,. #6. Language: Format: Language and Page Formatting Options. Compared to ext4, XFS has unlimited inode allocation, advanced allocation hinting (if you need it) and, in recent version, reflink support (but they need. EXT4 vs. So now I can boot up into a snapshot. Já que muitos usuários Linux, que desejam experimentar o novo sistema, vêm do Ext4, faz sentido enumerar alguns pontos que realçam as diferenças entre os dois: O Ext4 ainda é a melhor escolha, no desktop do usuário comum — por ser mais rápido na transferência de arquivos e por ser mais maduro6,861. Windows users don’t have much of a choice regarding a file system. Data Colossi & Data Centers: Ext4 is non-negotiable for handling extensive data transactions. WD & Windows vs. XFS 和 ext4 的比较. A maximum partition size of the btrfs file system is 16 exbibytes, as well as maximum file size is 16 exbibytes too. EXT4. 0-040700-generic (x86_64) Unity 7. Btrfs vs Ext4. XFS. All my systems (4) have been using BTRFS for some time now without any issues. For example, my virtualization server is currently hyper-v and I use ReFS instead of NTFS for features like bitrot protection, checksums, ect. Zu diesen gehören eine integrierte RAID-Funktionalität, ein inkludierter Volume Manager und die Unterstützung von Dateisystemen bis 16EiB. Được tích hợp vô hệ thống DSM Synology , do NAS có hiệu xuất làm việc cao trong vấn đề lưu trữ và khôi phục, Btrfs hoạt động trên NAS. Btrfs（技术预览）" Collapse section "6. Let's go over File Systems in this video. Because of this, and because EXT4 seems to have better TRIM support, my habit is to make SSD boot/root drives EXT4, and non-root bulk data spinning-rust drives/arrays XFS. The most commonly used are Ext4, Btrfs, XFS, and ZFS which is the most recent file system released back in 2018. Generally, would go with btrfs. Same could be said of reads, but if you have a TON of memory in the server that's greatly mitigated and work well. could go with btrfs even though it's still in beta and not recommended for production yet. Though personally I'd still go with ext4 primarily because despite recognizing some potential benefits of btrfs, I really don't see them as important for how I use my computers. For example btrfs supports transparent file compression. You can hot swap drives without rebooting, remove failed drives, swap in a larger drive and remove the smaller one, all without preparing ahead of time to do so. There was obviously some caching / lack of committing to disk involved that led to faster performance while the Btrfs file-system was in line with real-world expectations out of the. Fwiw, I think XFS still handles huge files better than EXT, so there are reasons to use it. Ext2 → Ext3 → Ext4. 7. Sun Microsystems originally created it as part of its Solaris operating system. The thing is I'm putting /home in a separate HDD. Ext4 was designed with spinning drives in mind but as SSDs are fundamentally different, an SSD optimized file system can help. 7-rc1 Released With NVIDIA GSP & Bcachefs While Itanium IA-64 Retired Linux Kernel :. Both are suitable for everyday use, but it's worth noting that ext4 partitions. org. e. OMV4 or OMV5. If you are using Ext2 or Ext3, you can convert the partition to Ext4. Silent data corruption, sometimes referred to as bitrot, is more. wbeater • 3 yr. Interestingly, the first version of the Ext4 filesystem, the Extended filesystem (“Ext”), came out in 1992 for the Minix OS. Page 2 of 2. /boot/efi has to be FAT32 (assuming you are using it as the ESP and not just adding partitions extra partitions under /boot to test how robust the boot sequence is). It is backward-compatible with older versions of Ext. 3. You get awesome functionality like cp --reflink and btrfs subvolume snapshot -r and btrfs send and btrfs receive . So I think you should have no strong preference, except to consider what you are familiar with and what is best documented. For example it's xfsdump/xfsrestore for xfs, dump/restore for ext2/3/4. Ability to shrink filesystem. However, the performance of ZFS on FreeBSD/PC-BSD 8. Si su aplicación falla con números de inodo grandes, monte el sistema de archivos XFS con la opción -o inode32 para imponer números de inodo inferiores a 232. So it has no barring. But. Ext4 Filesystem 其實你提到一個重點了. 15 Git kernels. In this article, we will have a look at deeper details at these file systems comparatively including EXT4 vs XFS, EXT4 vs EXT3, BTRFS vs EXT4 as well as ZFS vs EXT4. 3. Con: rumor has it that it is slower than ext3, the fsync dataloss soap. Two subvolumes, root and home, are created from that pool and mounted at / and /home respectively. For single disks over 4T, I would consider xfs over zfs or ext4. But. This article provides a detailed comparison of the three file systems to help you decide which one is the best for your needs. Latency for both XFS and EXT4. Ext4, Btrfs, and XFS are three widely used file systems in Linux. XFS, EXT4, and BTRFS are file systems commonly used in Linux-based operating systems. I am getting too many input/output errors with my 3TB HDD NTFS hard disk for main files. I developed an application recently and compared the I/O performance of both and found ext4 to be slightly quicker for my application which was really just opening and reading whole files into memory. The arguments about ext4 vs NTFS have been raging online for decades now. When running PostMark, ZFS came out far ahead of the UFS file-systems being more than ten times faster than. The reason that Ext4 is often recommended is that it is the most used and trusted filesystem out there on Linux today. ZoL Performance, Ubuntu ZFS On Linux Reference Storage : 2019-04-24: Linux 5. 7 - EXT4 vs. EXT4 being the “safer” choice of the two, it is by the most commonly used FS in linux based systems, and most applications are developed and tested on EXT4. Although Btrfs lacks stability and maturity as of this writing, it is more feature-rich than EXT4 despite this. To organize that data, ZFS uses a flexible tree in which each new system is a child. For example it's xfsdump/xfsrestore for xfs, dump/restore for ext2/3/4. All of these Linux. 240GB SSD formatted as EXT4 for main OS. Out of curiosity I have tried BTRFS (still unstable so I can't really expect to be able to use it) and noticed that the read speed is about 150% of ext4 - while write speed is comparable. LVM has snapshots. Btrfs come with compression algorithms present in the filesystem, allowing data to be compressed at the filesystem level right when written to the system. Xfs is very opinionated as filesystems go. Ext4 has journaling on by default, and new users likely won’t know how to disable it to save read/writes on their SSDs. Una vez que hemos conocido las principales características de EXT4, vamos a hablar sobre Btrfs, el que se conoce como sucesor natural del sistema de archivos EXT4. 84 nvme drives split up into a small ext4 volume and the rest is btrfs. Ceph's recommendation for the choice of filesystem is between btrfs and XFS. 0 as well as with the help of stock mount options. But according to tests in all scenarios, XFS is better than EXT4, it's a pity that there are no tests in games. Btrfs supports RAID 0, 1, 10, 5, and 6, while ZFS supports various RAID-Z levels (RAID-Z, RAID-Z2, and RAID-Z3). /boot/efi has to be FAT32 (assuming you are using it as the ESP and not just adding partitions extra partitions under /boot to test how robust the boot sequence is). 如果您追求高度的数据完整性和强大的快照功能，Btrfs可能是更好的选择。. 另外，我们常说的file对象，它用于关联进程和dentry对象的. also XFS has been recommended by many for MySQL/MariaDB for some time. jkool702. Tbh, it depends on game by game basis Team Fortress 2 will go as low as nearly 50%, same for KSP. OpenSUSE hiện sử dụng btrfs làm tùy chọn mặc định cho phân vùng /root, nơi đặt hệ điều hành. Compression is usually not very efficient on game data (that is already compressed) and can increase fragmentation. As others have said, btrfs is newer and offers a few advanced features for backups (snapshots) and data integrity. XFS. After much reading on ReFS, Btrfs, & ZFS, I've decided to run all 3 🤷♂️(Did the same with Seagate vs. This is not ZFS. 0 NVMe SSD was used for the benchmarking of these file-systems in different desktop use-cases. If you omit the size parameter, a journal size based on the size of the file system is used. Also, reducing the life of my SSD by a month is worth winning an argument from which I get absolutely no benefit. Business, Economics, and Finance. Regarding boot drives : Use enterprise grade SSDs, do not use low budget commercial grade equipment. EXT4 is functional and is considered more stable. If you are running a more stable system like Dabian based Linux EXT4 is a better choice because it's faster file system but not as easy to revert. . Ext4 is probably the final evolution of the ext filesystem (which started with ext, then ext2, ext3, and now ext4). Thanks. petronasAMG77 • 1 yr. The check task is involves reading roughly 2000 small files in their entirety and performing some processor intensive tasks on them. Moreover, the ext4 is more beneficial when the. jkool702. XFS vs. Comentado el. Btrfs is slower, especially on non-SSDs, because of CoW, but has a whole lot more going on under the hood in way of features and data integrity. Not just permissions, but moving them or getting file sizes, too. Various internet sources suggest that XFS is faster and better, but taking into account that they also suggest that EXT4 is. Even if you do notice. Use XFS for your array drives and Btrfs for your cache pool. Built By the Slant team. We currently recommend XFS for production deployments. Ext4 is a journaled filesystem, which simply means that it “journals” the location of the files on the disk and keeps track of the changes on the disk. It was later developed for Linux. It supports all. 3. This is why XFS might be a great candidate for an SSD. Tính năng tự khôi phục tập tin. ran defragment utility to compress all existing files. xfs command. But not enough users follow the guide on and instead do stuff that actually makes the system worse. But according to tests in all scenarios, XFS is better than EXT4, it's a pity that there are no tests in games. . And BRTFS has some really nice features in that area. XFS A number of Phoronix readers have been asking about some fresh file-system comparisons on recent kernels. Nhân bản toàn bộ Share. It is backward-compatible with older versions of Ext. Each of these file systems has its own way of organizing data, merits, and demerits. Following my post MySQL/ZFS Performance Update, a few people have suggested I should take a look at BTRFS (“butter-FS”, “b-tree FS”) with MySQL. Note that everything with LVM is at the block level which has major limitations. Multimedia Sanctuaries: With large files as daily bread, ext4 is indispensable. It supports large file systems and provides excellent scalability and reliability. I know the latest versions do not setup /home in a separate partition anymore but as a btrfs subvolume instead. Although XFS is good, in practice I've found ext4 to be slightly faster. EXT4, Btrfs, and XFS were tested on the Ubuntu mainline kernel PPA hosted Linux 3. xfs command. g. zfs or btrfs or ext4. Its primary developer, Kent Overstreet, first announced it in 2015, and it will be added to the Linux kernel beginning with 6. The XFS supports more file sizes and greater file or partition sizes. After a week of testing Btrfs on my laptop, I can conclude that there is a noticeable performance penalty vs Ext4 or XFS. 0 SSD drive used was a 250GB Samsung 850 PRO solid-state drive connected both via SATA and then a SATA. The most commonly used are Ext4, Btrfs, XFS, and ZFS which is the most recent file system released back in 2018. use ZFS only w/ ECC RAM. 6 Comments With FS-Mark there was a very noticeable drop with the XFS file-system with KPTI and Retpoline enabled while EXT4 saw the second largest drop while Btrfs and. ext4 with m=0 ext4 with m=0 and T=largefile4 xfs with crc=0 mounted them with: defaults,noatime defaults,noatime,discard defaults,noatime results show really no difference between first two, while plotting 4 at a time: time is around 8-9 hours. Hi I never worry about it… my latest SSD SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB has a 10 (limited) year 50GB a day warranty, Have OCZ’s with thousands of hours running btrfs all running fine. Btrfs is a more modern file system, introduced in 2007. 2. They both use delayed allocation to achieve file fragmentation while both do not support mounted snapshots. ZFS also has more options for caches and such things than EXT4. Because ext4 can't beat btrfs when it comes to snapshot/delete. Ext4 fs can read and write to Ext2 or Ext3 file systems, but the Ext4 it is not compatible with Ext2 and Ext3 drivers. 无论您选择哪个文件系统，都要确保进行适. XFS is special because it supports massive file systems, with file sizes of up to 8 exabytes supported. All have pros and cons. creating volumes and mounting them would need to check that option and decide on appropriate mount points. BTRFS has better backup capabilities, but is considered less stable, despite it working for me just fine with my testing of it. On the NVMe SSD, the four-thread FS-Mark was the fastest on XFS followed by Btrfs. 5. I was using NTFS due to compatibility. 0 File-System. , not available on the GUI for now) that allows choosing a file system from a white list, defaulting to ext4. Theodore Ts’o, a maintainer for Ext3 and later, Ext4, has stated that he sees Btrfs as a better way forward than continuing to rely on the ext* technology. EXT4 vs. As well as btrfs. To reserve an external journal with a specified size when you create an XFS file system, specify the -l logdev=device,size=size option to the mkfs. File-systems tested on the NVMe SSD included Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS, and NTFS. In most cases that’s EXT4, but for Fedora, OpenSuse and maybe a few others it’s btrfs. Btrfs is not a successor to the default Ext4 file system used in most Linux distributions, but it can be expected to replace Ext4 in the future. In Windows NTFS is used, while in Mac OS it is HFS, perhaps these will sound familiar to you, especially the typical FAT or its variants for. EXT4 and XFS show similarities in some features. X percent… The more modern filesystems of BTRFS and ZFS not only have data integrity features but also the inline compression pushes the efficiency past 100% in many cases. Yves Trudeau. One of the main reasons the XFS file system is used is for its support of large chunks of data. The only time there were issues was when my RAM sticks went bad and btrfs detected it and put my FS into read-only mode to prevent corruption. Linux 5. Btrfs vs. A execução do comando quotacheck em um sistema de. 4 To 4. EXT4 vs. btrfs was slower and had reliability problems. . ZFS ain't bad, but this whole btrfs data loss myth needs to stop. ReiserFS is another filesystem common to linux systems, but with some ongoing codebase issues whereby it periodically tries to kill your wife. En el caso de los servidores NAS de Synology, tenemos la posibilidad de configurar EXT4 o Btrfs, de hecho, en el asistente de configuración de los volúmenes podremos elegir entre uno y otro sin ningún problema. 5. Depending on why you want btrfs, you could run zfs. 불가능. Regarding boot drives : Use enterprise grade SSDs, do not use low budget commercial grade equipment. Silent data corruption, sometimes referred to as bitrot, is more. Btrfs vs Ext4. has built-in support for snapshots - useful for both backups and “testing out” scripts. 21 merge window (now known as Linux 5. The 12,3 % reduction in compilation time with BtrFS is a nice improvement but pales compared to the 58,4 % reduction seen with Ext4 on the same hardware doing the same task. Như vậy, chúng ta có thể dễ dàng kết hợp các phân vùng định dạng Ext2, Ext3 và Ext4 trong cùng 1 ổ đĩa trong Ubuntu để tăng hiệu suất hoạt động. For a side-by-side feature comparison of the major file systems in SUSE Linux. Installing and booting with BTRFS has its advantages too. Btrfs, EXT4, XFS, F2FS, and NILFS2 were tested on a Linux 5. Recommend. Both Btrfs and Ext4 have their own advantages. Checksumming, along with copy-on-write, provides the key method of ensuring file system integrity after unexpected power loss. For these reasons, Fedora has made BTRFS the standard filesystem in their newer releases. Probably those edge cases are not visible on an external USB hard drive, could be visible with external SSDs on a USB3. The use of checksums in Btrfs can prevent silent data corruption. Starting with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7. 0 SSD drive used was a 250GB Samsung 850 PRO solid-state drive connected both via SATA. However, the performance of ZFS on FreeBSD/PC-BSD 8. Ext4 seems better suited for lower-spec configurations although it will work just fine on faster ones as well, and performance-wise still better than btrfs in most cases. I have 6 disks so I have created 3 logical disks, 2 SSDs each - just for testing.